The Immigrant had this to say on Jan 12, 2006 Posts: 1
Err why must it contain either the words ‘Mac’ or make it that obvious it’s a laptop? The iPod doesn’t, and no one has problems understanding it.
Apple succeed when they are bold, and think differently. As has already been pointed out, MacBook is horribly similar to QuickBooks, that ‘orrible accounting software way back.
Off topic a little… something I haven’t seen suggested yet for the PowerMacs… Mighty Mac! Ouch that hurts! But the Pro Mouse did become the Mighty Mouse… scary. (I’d switch to Linux if they ever called it Mighty Mac)
Chris Howard had this to say on Jan 12, 2006 Posts: 1209
Steve is obviously looking to clearly define the difference between the competitions Intel-based PC’s and his. How many people call all MP3 players “iPod”? (I certainly know a few people who think that all MP3 players are called that!).
I hated MacBook Pro at first but it does the job given Steve’s reasoning - I don’t think of Quickbooks any more than I think of Quickbooks when I hear iBook.
However, what on earth do they call the iBook and the new desktops? Can’t have iMacBook, MacDesk sounds awful and something like MacTower sounds like fast food!
Marc Jones had this to say on Jan 12, 2006 Posts: 14
MacAside
MacAlong
MacWithme
pMac
lMac
MyMac
MacTakeAlong
UnWiredMac
MacUnplugged
MacUPi
don.antonio had this to say on Jan 12, 2006 Posts: 1
I think my problem is more with the “Pro” than the first part of the name intself. It’s just the sort of verbal garbage that’s added to names of Windows software that doesn’t actually mean anything. I don’t mind “MacBook” by itself. Maybe the iBook will just be “MacBook” and the PowerBook will be “MacBook Pro”?
Why not just keep calling it a PowerBook? Apple called its laptops PowerBooks even before they used the PowerPC processor—i.e., all the models with three numbers in their designation (PowerBook 160, etc.). I remember when the first PowerPC Powerbooks came out, some people (whimsically) wondered if they’d be called the PowerPowerBooks.
Because non-Apple-devotee types are seemingly not associating “PowerBook” with “Apple Mac” I assume (?).
Marc Jones had this to say on Jan 12, 2006 Posts: 14
I think the reason “MacBook Pro” sounds so strange to everyone is because it has come out before the iBook replacement which most likely will simply be called “MacBook.” If you look at it in the context of the MacBook and the MacBook Pro it seems to make more sense. The Pro part of the name is in line with other Apple products like Final Cut Pro and DVD Studio Pro. Let’s just hope that the iBook replacement isn’t actually going to be “MacBook Express” and the PowerMac replacement isn’t “iMac Pro.”
Comments
My suggestions are:
Mactop
Lapmac
“Bookmac” sounds better.
Err why must it contain either the words ‘Mac’ or make it that obvious it’s a laptop? The iPod doesn’t, and no one has problems understanding it.
Apple succeed when they are bold, and think differently. As has already been pointed out, MacBook is horribly similar to QuickBooks, that ‘orrible accounting software way back.
I’d have gone for something like iBook. Oh, wait…
Off topic a little… something I haven’t seen suggested yet for the PowerMacs… Mighty Mac! Ouch that hurts! But the Pro Mouse did become the Mighty Mouse… scary. (I’d switch to Linux if they ever called it Mighty Mac)
Steve is obviously looking to clearly define the difference between the competitions Intel-based PC’s and his. How many people call all MP3 players “iPod”? (I certainly know a few people who think that all MP3 players are called that!).
I hated MacBook Pro at first but it does the job given Steve’s reasoning - I don’t think of Quickbooks any more than I think of Quickbooks when I hear iBook.
However, what on earth do they call the iBook and the new desktops? Can’t have iMacBook, MacDesk sounds awful and something like MacTower sounds like fast food!
MacAside
MacAlong
MacWithme
pMac
lMac
MyMac
MacTakeAlong
UnWiredMac
MacUnplugged
MacUPi
Mac on the Move
MobileMac
I think my problem is more with the “Pro” than the first part of the name intself. It’s just the sort of verbal garbage that’s added to names of Windows software that doesn’t actually mean anything. I don’t mind “MacBook” by itself. Maybe the iBook will just be “MacBook” and the PowerBook will be “MacBook Pro”?
Why not just keep calling it a PowerBook? Apple called its laptops PowerBooks even before they used the PowerPC processor—i.e., all the models with three numbers in their designation (PowerBook 160, etc.). I remember when the first PowerPC Powerbooks came out, some people (whimsically) wondered if they’d be called the PowerPowerBooks.
Because non-Apple-devotee types are seemingly not associating “PowerBook” with “Apple Mac” I assume (?).
I think the reason “MacBook Pro” sounds so strange to everyone is because it has come out before the iBook replacement which most likely will simply be called “MacBook.” If you look at it in the context of the MacBook and the MacBook Pro it seems to make more sense. The Pro part of the name is in line with other Apple products like Final Cut Pro and DVD Studio Pro. Let’s just hope that the iBook replacement isn’t actually going to be “MacBook Express” and the PowerMac replacement isn’t “iMac Pro.”
Macintosh Portable!! Oh wait, nevermind…
MacDualie
MacSolo
LeBigMac
RoyaleWithCheese
I believe they missed the boat on “Intelintosh.”
Ha. I kid.
MacBook Pro
MacBook
iMac
MacPro (for desktop)
PortaMac is way too funny, but I wouldn’t want to pee in one! Might get a iFireBall.